Texas Federal Court Bars Coverage Attorney’s Expert Testimony
In Corinth Investor Holdings, LLC v. Evanston Insurance Co., 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 172647 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 15, 2014), the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas granted the...
View ArticleA Line Drawn in the Soil: Jeep is Not a “Farm Implement” Under Farm Policy
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois applied the “eight-corners” rule to determine that insurer had no duty to defend or indemnify insured in Elmore v. Grinnell Mutual...
View ArticleIt’s not “12 Corners” — Court Holds Answer does not Trigger Duty to Defend
It is a well-known insurance principle that the duty to defend is determined using the “Eight-Corners” method — comparing the four corners of the complaint to the four corners of the insurance policy....
View ArticleTexas Federal Court Bars Coverage Attorney’s Expert Testimony
In Corinth Investor Holdings, LLC v. Evanston Insurance Co., 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 172647 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 15, 2014), the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas granted the...
View ArticleA Line Drawn in the Soil: Jeep is Not a “Farm Implement” Under Farm Policy
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois applied the “eight-corners” rule to determine that insurer had no duty to defend or indemnify insured in Elmore v. Grinnell Mutual...
View ArticleIt’s not “12 Corners” — Court Holds Answer does not Trigger Duty to Defend
It is a well-known insurance principle that the duty to defend is determined using the “Eight-Corners” method — comparing the four corners of the complaint to the four corners of the insurance policy....
View ArticleEleventh Circuit Upholds Florida’s Strict Interpretation of Eight Corners...
In Mt. Hawley Ins. Co. v. Roebuck, the liability insurer for the owners of a Florida outdoor shopping mall sought to avoid coverage in connection with a stabbing that occurred at the mall based on the...
View Article
